tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3599102892768830332.post7261613829177062600..comments2023-09-01T07:43:20.332-05:00Comments on ART 223: Modern and Contemporary Art HIstory: Alison Fraunharhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12482978730859289584noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3599102892768830332.post-4971573262471171992010-02-15T08:50:35.188-06:002010-02-15T08:50:35.188-06:00Jesse,
You'v still got to work on grammar and ...Jesse,<br />You'v still got to work on grammar and spelling ---it's Nickleodeon with an "o", not Nickleodean with an "a". And it's Columbia, South Carolina, not "South Carolina, columbia (with a lower case "c"" --Charlie Chaplin, not Chapmin, and you can't analyze a contemporary photo and claim that that's what it looked like then- Chaplin was not an actor in Niclkleodeon films. He came later. There are plenty of archival photos of Nickleodeons available online. There are other misspellings and awkward grammar, too. <br />Beyond that, in terms of content, this is a good example of why it's not a good idea to get ahead of the lectures. You leave out essential parts of the story of how and why Nickleodeons came about ad the history of the development of film technology: at the time when Nickleodeons were popular, radio was not yet omnipresent, and films were not usually fifteen minutes long- they ranged from 30sec. to 5 min.Alison Fraunharhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12482978730859289584noreply@blogger.com